Thinking fast and Slow

The brain operates two systems: automatic (impulsive, intuitive) and considered (considered).
System one operates intuitively and suddenly, often without conscious control.
This system is a legacy of our evolutionary past, allowing rapid actions and judgments.
System two deals with conscious activities of the mind, such as self-control and deliberate focus of attention.
System two helps eliminate potential distractions, enabling us to spot a woman in a crowd quickly.
The relationship between these two systems determines how we behave.

The bat and ball problem illustrates how laziness can lead to errors and affect intelligence.
System one, impulsive and intuitive, often answers too quickly, leading to a mistake.
In the bat and ball problem, system one perceives the problem as simpler than it is, causing it to assume it can handle it on its own.
This laziness is a result of the law of least effort, where the brain uses the minimum amount of energy for each task.
System two tasks like focus and self-control, which are crucial for intelligence, are often avoided due to laziness.
Research shows that practicing system two tasks like focus and self-control leads to higher intelligence scores.

Priming, the unconscious process of recalling related words and concepts, is a significant factor in our thoughts and actions.
Exposure to certain words or concepts can lead to subconscious priming, affecting our thoughts and actions.
Studies show that individuals primed with words associated with being elderly, such as Florida and wrinkle, respond slower to walking.
Priming, like other societal elements, can influence an individual's thoughts, choices, judgments, and behavior, influencing the culture and influencing the society we live in.

Snap Judgments:
The mind makes quick decisions despite lack of information.
The halo effect, or oversimplification of information, leads to judgment errors.
Confirmation bias, the tendency to agree with information supporting beliefs, also contributes to judgment errors.
Both the halo effect and confirmation bias occur due to the mind's eagerness to make quick judgments.
These cognitive phenomena occur without conscious awareness and affect our choices, judgments, and actions.

Heuristics: Shortcuts for Quick Decisions
The mind uses shortcuts to make quick judgments.
These shortcuts are called heuristics.
Overuse of heuristics can lead to mistakes.
Types of Heuristics
Substitution Heuristic: Answers an easier question than the actual one.
Example: If a candidate's background and policies don't match our mental image, we may reject her.
Availability Heuristic: Overestimates the probability of something we hear or remember easily.
Example: 80% of respondents considered an accidental death a more likely fate due to media coverage and stronger impression.
This can lead to inappropriate reactions to dangerous situations.

Base Rate in Predictions
The base rate is a statistical base that other statistics rely on.
For instance, a taxi company's base rate for yellow cabs is 20%, and for red cabs it's 80%.
Remembering the base rate can help make accurate predictions.
Base Rate Neglect
This is a common mistake where we focus on what we expect rather than what is most likely.
The probability of the next cab being red is around 80%, regardless of the number of cabs.
Regressing to the Mean
This acknowledges that all situations have their average status, and variations from that average will eventually tilt back toward the average.
For instance, a football striker scoring 10 goals in September may not be criticized for not continuing her hot streak, as she's only regressing to the mean.

Two memory selves: experiencing and remembering.
Experienced self records present feelings, providing a more accurate account of events.
Remembering self records the entire event after the event, less accurate.
The remembering self dominates memory due to duration neglect and the peak-end rule.
An experiment showed that those who endured longer procedures felt worse during the process, but felt worse after the event when the remembering self took over.
This highlights the importance of duration neglect, the peak-end rule, and faulty memories in our memories.

Minds use different energy levels depending on the task.
Cognitive ease is a state where intuitive system one is in charge, while cognitive strain involves more energy and cognitive strain.
In cognitive ease, intuitive system one is more creative and happy, but more likely to make mistakes.
In cognitive strain, awareness is heightened, and system two is in charge.
Cognitive strain helps us succeed in tasks like statistical problems by increasing energy levels to comprehend the problem.
Conscious influence can influence the amount of energy the mind uses to achieve the right frame of mind for tasks.

The way probabilities are presented to us significantly influences our judgment of risk.
Even with carefully calculated probabilities, changing the way they are expressed can alter our approach.
The Mr. Jones experiment demonstrates how a change in the probability of a risk can significantly influence our decision-making process.
Denominator neglect, where we ignore statistical data in favor of vivid mental images, can also influence our judgment.
For instance, a drug's potential for permanent disfigurement can be more influential than its actual chance of preventing it.

Utility theory suggests individuals make decisions based on rational facts, choosing the option with the best overall outcome.
The Chicago School of Economics, led by Milton Friedman, argued that individuals are ultra-rational decision makers, valuing goods and services based on their rational needs.
Econs, or individuals in the marketplace, value their wealth rationally, weighing only how much utility it provides them.
The theory suggests that if two people have different starting points, they may not be equally happy with their wealth.
This suggests that there is more to the way we value things than pure utility theory.
As a result, we can make seemingly irrational decisions.

Emotional factors often influence decision-making, not just rational ones.
Prospect theory, developed by John, challenges utility theory by demonstrating that we don't always act rationally when making choices.
Two scenarios illustrate this: a choice between a sure bet and a gamble.
Prospect theory explains why people don't always act rationally: loss aversion and the diminishing sensitivity principle.
The starting point affects how we value our position, making the choice between a sure bet and a gamble.
The diminishing sensitivity principle suggests that perceived value may differ from actual worth. For instance, going from $1,000 to $900 doesn't feel as bad as going from $200 to $100.

The mind constructs complete mental images to explain ideas and concepts.
These images are used to make decisions, such as deciding what clothes to wear in a given season.
However, overconfidence and mistakes can result from relying too heavily on these images.
Even when available statistics contradict these images, we still let them guide us, leading to faulty predictions.
Overcoming overconfidence can be achieved by using reference class forecasting and long-term risk policies.
These strategies help to rely on evidence instead of general mental images, leading to more accurate forecasts.

Back